Whom of the judges in the Trial Courts “the hard subjects (cases)” should be given to?

What are “the hard subjects (cases)”?

Are the hard subjects (cases) those, which stand into the drawer and cannot be solved because of the more pedant position when you are solving “light ones”? Are “the hard subjects (cases)” those ones that which last up to 10 years?

Should the subjects (cases) be divided on “hard” and “ light” according to the area and type they belong to?

Are there in the same area and type of subjects (cases) “hard ones” and “light ones”?

How the bordering to be done between the subjects (cases) and the capacities of judges?

And who is authorized to make such bordering?

Should in the first place the “light” subjects (cases) be solved, so the number of solved subjects (cases) is “preserved”?

Why you answer the question with the question?

Do I really do that?

Whatever! The Appellate Court will return the verdict two or three times anyway, or it will suspend the verdict. Who cares about that?